SEA-PHAGES Logo

The official website of the HHMI Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science program.

Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.

All posts created by debbie

| posted 01 May, 2020 20:16
Ellen,
Historically, we called the capsid maturation protease based on synteny. We would like to have more evidence than that when calling it now. So it depends on which gene and phage genome you are talking about.

However, to answer you question generally, if you have the evidence you describe above, you would record exactly what you said for the SIFs, and the function call would be Hypothetical Protein. If you let me know what gene/genome, i could be of greater help.

debbie
Posted in: Notes and Final FilesSIF HHPred Notation
| posted 01 May, 2020 20:00
Hi Jamie,
I would continue to call this a tail terminator for 2 reasons.
One, the minor tail protein of lambda that it hits is a tail terminator along with the SPP1 hits. Secondly, it is in the right place for it. I agree, we fall under the threshold of 90% probability, and I usually don't consider anything under 90%, but in this case I think it is a good prediction.
Posted in: AnnotationTail Terminator in Cluster EE
| posted 30 Apr, 2020 09:31
Fred,
I too would be inclined to delete this gene.
debbie
Posted in: AnnotationGene or not a gene? MrMiyagi
| posted 30 Apr, 2020 09:22
Hi Fred,
My recommendation is to not take any one piece of data when making this decision. I believe the best start can most easily be derived from the Starterator report. Take a look. comparative data is always useful.
Let me know if you have additional questions.
debbie

PS There is a lot of biology in the answer to your general question. The ribosome loves to treat the sequence like one big operon, but that isn't what happens. Starts and stops along the way have to do with regulation, most of which falls into the 'I don't know why' category.
Posted in: AnnotationGeneral Question on RBS scores and start selection
| posted 26 Apr, 2020 14:47
Hi Fred,
Thanks. First of all, Heath is a cluster B4 phage. Have you noticed the orange lines that crisscross the B4 genomes in phamerator. Do you know what that is indicating?

They are likely some sort of repeats. There are 2 resources to point you to:
1. A paper: Cluster K mycobacteriophages: insights into the evolutionary origins of mycobacteriophage TM4

2. Check out Section 4.2.3.in this doc "Exploring bacteriophage biology".

It would be great to look for them! What you don't want to do is include the repeats in your protein calls.

In both cases, I would call the genes much shorter than you, mostly to respect the coding potential. For gene 79, I think most of the data fits a start at 63861.
For gene 74, I think that most of the data fits a start at 62311.

Let me know what you think or if you have additional questions. Please add the forum post (just a link) to your cover letter when you submit this genome. So that the reviewer knows the energy that you invested in the calls.

debbie
Posted in: AnnotationTricky Start position decision
| posted 25 Apr, 2020 13:03
Hi Fred,
I would need additional info to help evaluate. What is the phage? Would you attach your DNA Master file? Have you looked at Starterator data?
debbie
Posted in: AnnotationTricky Start position decision
| posted 24 Apr, 2020 14:37
Hi. I was able to get on a minute ago. Wanna try again?
debbie
Posted in: PECAANPECAAN Down?
| posted 08 Apr, 2020 22:13
Susanne,
Yes!
The correct way to document your tRNA is found here:
https://seaphagesbioinformatics.helpdocsonline.com/documenting-trnas-in-dna-master

Good Luck,
debbie
Edited 08 Apr, 2020 22:18
Posted in: tRNAstRNA start/stop coordinates
| posted 31 Mar, 2020 13:25
Hi Deb,
I knew that the data obtained in PECAAN was static, meaning if you ran the programs on March 2019 and then reviewed on March 2020, the results would be different because the PECAAN data was out-of-date.

What I didn't know, or rather didn't quite put together, is that the HHPred databases are downloaded periodically at WKU, allowing all of the programs to run faster. So, Claire Rinehart and colleague, Dex Wood, are actually looking for results such as what you just got to know that the data is discrepant enough to check on database dates. Today Dex found 2 databases out of date and will upload them tonight. When you re-run your HHPred data, the results will change a bit.

Good catch!
debbie
Posted in: Functional AnnotationCluster EA1- tail terminator
| posted 30 Mar, 2020 12:07
Kyle,
Yes! Have you made a phage page for Gole? That is the first step. Second step is to email Dan with the request to post the sequence there.
Cool!
debbie
Posted in: AnnotationGene Numbering Questions and More: Phage SilentRX (UNK)