SEA-PHAGES Logo

The official website of the HHMI Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science program.

Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.

All posts created by debbie

| posted 21 Jun, 2023 19:03
Sally Molloy (University of Maine, Honors College) has shown an in-depth investigation of what is needed to call a protein RecA. Attached is a doc with links to her Power Point presentation and her video describing her presentation.
Edited 23 Aug, 2023 16:20
Posted in: SMART Function InvestigationsRecA requirements
| posted 21 Jun, 2023 18:36
Maria,
Thanks for sharing this. i hope others find it helpful.
best,
debbie
Posted in: Phage Discovery/IsolationElectron Microscopes
| posted 16 Jun, 2023 14:30
If you are unsure of how to call the sigma factor, we recommend not calling it as such, instead use DNA binding protein.
Posted in: Cluster A Annotation TipsSigma factor vs DNA-directed RNA pol
| posted 16 Jun, 2023 12:41
Cluster A phages can have tyrosine, serine integrases, or partitioning genes.
For the serine integrates, see the note about Bxb1 starts. Serine recombinases are called jumbo integrases because their size hovers around 500 amino acids (can go up over 700 amino acids). Look for serine residues in the N-terminus.
Historically we didn't differentiate serine integrases from tyrosine integrases. Ask for help if you can't tell which one is in your genome.
Some Cluster A phages, (I believe the first one identified is RedRock) don't have an integrase, but exist as an extra-chromosomal inhabitant of a bacterial cell. In order to be propagated, a partitioning system is utilized.

See this paper for details:
Dedrick RM, Mavrich TN, Ng WL, Cervantes Reyes JC, Olm MR, Rush RE, Jacobs-Sera D, Russell DA, Hatfull GF. Function, expression, specificity, diversity and incompatibility of actinobacteriophage parABS systems. Mol Microbiol. 2016 Aug;101(4):625-44. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13414. Epub 2016 Jun 10. PMID: 27146086; PMCID: PMC4998052.
Posted in: Cluster A Annotation TipsIntegrases/Partitioning Systems
| posted 15 Jun, 2023 02:50
The F2 phage Soul22 was annotated with a single immunity repressor but at the time we were annotating the genome, we did find another gp that we could have called an immunity repressor, but it more resembled that in A1 phages. So we did not identify the function as an immunity repressor. But it may very well be an immunity repressor but NOT to the F2 phages but to A1 phages (I have some prelim lab data indicating it is functional as one against A1 phages; we will be following up on this in the fall). The A1 repressor is also found in at least some C1 phages. Bottom line – how do we annotate a second immunity repressor that is specific for a different cluster than the phage it is found in?
This post and question was constructed at 2023 Faculty Meeting: Cluster Specific Annotation Tips.

Hi all,
This is definitely worth the post, but more data is needed to annotated this. When wet bench data is available, post here. We are looking forward to those experiments!
debbie
Posted in: Cluster F Annotation TipsImmunity Repressor and CRO starts
| posted 15 Jun, 2023 02:10
Kirk,
This pham is quite messy. I would call the longest ORF and call the r-h-h for this one even though other members of this pham cannot call it.
debbie
Posted in: Functional AnnotationUsavi_draft_70: potentially ribbon-helix-helix?
| posted 15 Jun, 2023 00:33
I would call this a phosphoesterase too.
debbie
Posted in: Functional AnnotationPhosphoesterase or metallophosphoesterase? A clarification question
| posted 14 Jun, 2023 18:16
Please Read!
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24335314/
Posted in: Cluster M Annotation TipsSuggested Reading: tRNAs in Cluster M phages
| posted 07 Jun, 2023 23:30
Rick,
I think that this version of TAC matches L5's -1 frameshift.
https://seaphagesbioinformatics.helpdocsonline.com/article-54
G_GG.G_GA.
Wanna check?
debbie
Posted in: Cluster EA Annotation Tipsframe shift
| posted 07 Jun, 2023 20:23
Lee,
The confusing part of Kathleen's post is the sentence that states "But we don't understand why Starterator didn't call the most annotated start." But she is here today so we are able to discuss.
The reason that Starterator doesn't make the right call is becuase it only reports what is in in the files submitted to phamerator. –Meaning in this particular case, Frankenweenie's auto-annotated is not what others ID'd as the best start to call. In fact, Kathleen and her students went to Starterator to justify making a change. That sentence in Starterator is to be coupled with the yellow line in the Frankenweenie graph and recogonized as in DRAFT form. What Kathleen and her students wanted was for Starterator to make the right call. Technically, it makes NO calls and just reports what was called (making human calls green and auto calls yellow).
Posted in: Cluster BM Annotation TipsInterpreting Starterator data in BM cluster phages