SEA-PHAGES Logo

The official website of the HHMI Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science program.

Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.

All posts created by debbie

| posted 16 Mar, 2024 22:16
From Ann Findley:
"I just checked with our computer science folks who were responsible for writing the code and administering the database. Unfortunately, when they went into the AWS account that was hosting the PET they were not able to recover the code. The latest information is that they are attempting to use an earlier version of PET to resurrect the tool. I am not certain of their timeline for completion."
Best,
debbie
Posted in: General Message BoardPhage Enzyme Tools - PET2.0 - Down?
| posted 07 Mar, 2024 15:58
Hi Katie and Steve,
The space where the DNA Master server lives is undergoing renovations. It is expected to be back next week. I'll keep you posted.
debbie
Edited 07 Mar, 2024 16:07
Posted in: DNA MasterCritical Update: Installing New Copies of DNA Master or Updating Old Versions of DNA Master prior to Version 2701
| posted 03 Mar, 2024 20:46
Fred,
I wold not look to fill this space in the same way I might be inclined to do so at the right end of the genome. This space is likely part of the immunity cassette, and is likely expressed during lysogeny. I would not call this gene.
debbie
Posted in: Cluster F Annotation Tips4 bp overlaps
| posted 03 Mar, 2024 11:03
Thank Claire,
After reviewing your data, i am beginning to believe that conformity is not all that its cracked up to be!
I agree with your assessment of gene 18 in Luxx. the 4-base overlap is much more convincing than the bigger overlap. We used alpha-fold to fold the longer version of 18 and the lysin, and no structures were observed to be helpful. So while the data may not change for a while, I agree that the start choice that Claire points out (the 4 base overlap) is a better choice.

For genes 21 and 22, I like the original 'conformity' calls because of coding potential evaluations. So call upon your best gene evaluation skills and make your best call.

Please draw attention to these genes in your cover letter, so that the QCer can also evaluate.

Anyone want to do some bench work?!!

Best,
debbie
Posted in: Cluster EE Annotation TipsGenome Curation - a must read!
| posted 29 Feb, 2024 02:40
Check HHPred results. Yes, they are not in the typical synteny.
Though it is not common, it is not uncommon.
debbie
Posted in: Functional AnnotationMinor tail proteins far upstream of the tape measure protein?
| posted 22 Feb, 2024 21:48
I changed the approve function to say: "Typically has HEXXH motif but other metalloprotease motifs (e.g. "ExnHxHx7Sx2D)"
debbie
Posted in: Functional AnnotationMetalloprotease without HEXXH motif?
| posted 21 Feb, 2024 18:20
Hi Beth,
What phage are you annotating? Could you provide the phamerator gene number and its stop codon.
Thanks,
debbie
Posted in: Functional AnnotationMetalloprotease without HEXXH motif?
| posted 17 Feb, 2024 13:54
Fred,
I think you have a good choice!
Best,
debbie
Posted in: Gene or not a GeneIs the current subcluster A4 pham 4236 (as of 2/14/2024) really a gene?
| posted 16 Feb, 2024 17:06
H John,
This is on my plate to fix. They will be in phamerator soon
debbie
Posted in: Cluster FC Annotation TipsAnnotated Cluster FC Phages
| posted 15 Feb, 2024 20:12
I don't think that it matters if they are ATG, GTG, or TTG.
Starts are starts and the amino acids chain start with an fMet.
debbie
Posted in: Choosing Start SitesTwo consecutive ATG start sites