Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.
Recent Activity
byrumc@cofc.edu posted in Getting Started with Phage Assembly
byrumc@cofc.edu posted in Getting Started with Phage Assembly
byrumc@cofc.edu posted in Getting Started with Phage Assembly
byrumc@cofc.edu posted in Classificiation with ICTV guidelines
Debbie Jacobs-Sera posted in Classificiation with ICTV guidelines
All posts created by debbie
Link to this post | posted 20 May, 2021 19:52 | |
---|---|
|
It does now. Sorry about the ![]() |
Link to this post | posted 07 May, 2021 20:42 | |
---|---|
|
You too! Terrific that you contacted Kirk! Thanks, debbie |
Link to this post | posted 07 May, 2021 20:03 | |
---|---|
|
Hi Andrea, i do not know how to do this in PECAAN, but in following Kirk's explanation for Coco12, i would annotate it the same way he did. debbie |
Link to this post | posted 07 May, 2021 19:23 | |
---|---|
|
Hi Kristen and all, This is one of those genes that needs a dig deep. Here are some of what i have been thinking. I am reluctant to call a RecE without a RecT. I don't know how to differentiate between a RecE, a generic exonuclease or the Cas4 family exonuclease. I am looking forward to what we can figure out about these. Good question, sorry to not be of much help. debbie |
Link to this post | posted 05 May, 2021 01:02 | |
---|---|
|
I would delete this gene because we don't believe that 2 genes exist in the same space of a genome. Genes can overlap a bit, but this is completely covered by the forward genes 35 and 37. they are better choices because it is unlikely that a gene would be in the opposite direction 'for no good reason'. What do you think? debbie |
Link to this post | posted 04 May, 2021 20:47 | |
---|---|
|
Becky, I wrote this way before Chris posted. So to muddle this a bit. Hi. I think I would like to call this O-acetyltransferase A. I have attached an article that describes this gene as having 2 domains, which I believe I see in LonelyBoi_31, namely an acetyltransferase and a SGNH hydrolase fold. Let me know what you think, debbie https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021925817494105?via%3Dihub |
Link to this post | posted 04 May, 2021 19:59 | |
---|---|
|
Hi folks, I need more info. What is the relationship with the upstream and downstream gene in this genome? Cluster F genomes are chucked full of tiny genes that have the 4 bp overlap with each other. If this gene has that I would call it. Also blastn the sequence to see if this is more highly conserved. If it is, does that influence your call? Looking forward to what you are thinking? Send the .dnam5 file is you want me to look further. Thanks, debbie |
Link to this post | posted 03 May, 2021 12:56 | |
---|---|
|
Hi, I would use this terminology: RepA-like replication initiator What do you think? debbie |
Link to this post | posted 27 Apr, 2021 13:18 | |
---|---|
|
It could also be that a Visuals Basic package is missing https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=5555 |
Link to this post | posted 27 Apr, 2021 13:03 | |
---|---|
|
Hi Fernando, I think you will need to install windows drivers again. I am not sure how to do that. Can you check with your IT people? debbie |