Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.
Recent Activity
JustinA posted in Plaques appear on spot test, don't appear in titer
Viknesh Sivanathan posted in Plaques appear on spot test, don't appear in titer
JustinA posted in Plaques appear on spot test, don't appear in titer
Viknesh Sivanathan posted in Plaques appear on spot test, don't appear in titer
RyanWheeler posted in Plaques appear on spot test, don't appear in titer
All posts created by debbie
Link to this post | posted 03 Jun, 2019 20:11 | |
---|---|
|
Recently, we learned that all siphos do not need to have one or both of the TACs. So it would not be wrong to omit the call without evidence. |
Link to this post | posted 03 Jun, 2019 19:48 | |
---|---|
|
Maria, If there is a frameshift, it is a -1 because the second gene is -1 from the first. However, I don't see a slippery sequence to call in FuzzBuster. My quick look at HHPred in PECAAN, says you might not even want to call these things TAC. If you are using PECAAN, you might want to re-run your HHPred in PECAAN because it is dated Jan, 2019. I believe the databases used around that time were not complete. debbie |
Link to this post | posted 28 May, 2019 12:52 | |
---|---|
|
Fernando, You have called the frameshift exactly correctly. It is a -1 frameshift. The "G" gene is annotated as 14986 - 15363, product is "tail assembly chaperone. The "T" gene is annotated as 14986 - 15785, with 2 regions (14986 - 15339, 15339 - 15785), product is tail assembly chaperone. So it sounds like what confused you is that the "g" gene 'happened to be located in the top frame of the six-frame translation output". and you your real question is where would the -1 frame be, in relationship to that. As you can now see, it is the bottom displayed frame. Is that what you were asking? debbie |
Link to this post | posted 24 May, 2019 16:39 | |
---|---|
|
Fernando, Please send me your DNA Master file and I can show you. If you make sure each region is divisible by 3 it will show you where to cut it. If this is a -1 frameshift (most certainly it is), the last nucleotide of region 1 is the first nucleotide of region 2. Your frame jumping question is not easy to follow when the ribosome is really slipping backwards. debbie |
Link to this post | posted 20 May, 2019 19:33 | |
---|---|
|
Dear SEA-PHAGES faculty, Have you see phage DNA appear as a smear on an agarose gel? There are particular instances in which DNA modification can lead to degradation in the gel buffers, such that even undigested genomic DNA appears as a smear. It’s possible that you’ve observed it but not necessarily submitted the DNA for sequencing. We would like to hear whether or not you’ve seen this. We’ve opened up a Forum at seaphagesdb.org, and would like to encourage you to indicate with which phages you saw this (with pictures if you have them) or point to a phage pages on phagesdb.org if the data are posted there. But we’d also like it if you could post a note saying that you have never seen this, if that is the case. If you have further questions, don’t hesitate to contact me. Thanks! debbie |
Link to this post | posted 15 May, 2019 18:26 | |
---|---|
|
Sally, Technically, we can call a single TMD if 2 programs find it. I would not be opposed to calling them both Hypothetical Proteins. I just looked at these in phamerator. These 2 genes are found in a region of high nucleotide pairwise similarity (the purple color inbetween). However, the first of these 2 genes is a member of 3 different phams. Are they all calling different things, or is this a case of small genes not meeting alignment cut-offs to make it into the same pham? debbie |
Link to this post | posted 07 May, 2019 19:19 | |
---|---|
|
Kristen, While I agree the currently called ribosomal slippage is not a stellar example, I don't think the placement of your proposed slippage works (because you are slipping out of the first frame too soon). I think we are approximately at the right place if there is indeed a frameshift. If you look at Powerball, the GGGGACT is not there…….. Kristen - I'll ask Welkin for her in put. debbie |
Link to this post | posted 24 Apr, 2019 18:25 | |
---|---|
|
Christos, Try the following things, one may do the trick. If not send it to me and I will try to make it work. At the feature table, go to the left sequence tab. Once in the window, above the sequence, click on the button "raw". Recreate your documentation. Go to documentation, the click on recreate. Save the file as a new name and see if it works. If you do need my help, what is he trying to export? debbie |
Link to this post | posted 19 Apr, 2019 18:45 | |
---|---|
|
Sara, Nope. Sorry for the confusion. I think that peak is a gene (7165-7272). I just have no confidence it is the T of the G/T frameshift, so I would not assign a function to it. |
Link to this post | posted 18 Apr, 2019 13:27 | |
---|---|
|
Sara, This is a timely question. This summer Welkin learned that siphoviridae do not have to have 2 tail assembly chaperone genes. Some can have one. Our evidence for phage Laila is that it has one. When we originally called these genomes, we assumed 2. I think that little gene between the TAC and TMP, gene 14, is real, but not necessarily a tail assembly chaperone (and therefore a hypothetical protein). Make sense? thanks for the question! debbie |