Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.
Recent Activity
cdshaffer posted in Whole phage starterator reports
fbaliraine posted in Phage DoRead Start at 52714 bp with 8 bp overlap vs start at 52718 with 4 bp overlap?
Debbie Jacobs-Sera posted in Phage DoRead Start at 52714 bp with 8 bp overlap vs start at 52718 with 4 bp overlap?
All posts created by debbie
Link to this post | posted 23 Aug, 2018 14:24 | |
---|---|
|
The cpapsid is fused to the capsid maturation protease (gp7 in Corgi). |
Posted in: Cluster FE Annotation Tips → capsid and protease fusion
Link to this post | posted 22 Aug, 2018 16:01 | |
---|---|
|
This cluster has 2 tyrosine integrases. |
Posted in: Cluster AY Annotation Tips → Two integrases
Link to this post | posted 22 Aug, 2018 16:00 | |
---|---|
|
When you come across the gene that hits IrrE in these genomes Example: Richie gp53(reverse), you will find that the domain that these genes share with IrrE is the 'helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain'. |
Posted in: Cluster AY Annotation Tips → No IrrE found here
Link to this post | posted 22 Aug, 2018 15:56 | |
---|---|
|
The 6 genomes that we reviewed today *Auxilium, Hestia, Richie, SeaHorse, Faja, and Isolde all have a small terminase subunit. The large terminase subunit, except for Hestia, is split into 2 gene products: "terminase, large subunit (ATPase domain)" and "terminase, large subunit (nulcease domain)". |
Posted in: Cluster AY Annotation Tips → Large terminase in two pieces
Link to this post | posted 22 Aug, 2018 15:52 | |
---|---|
|
While further investigation may yield a more specific designation, the gene products that match Lambda repressor C1 are called "helix-turn-helix DNA binding proteins". Example: Auxilium gp49(reverse) & gp50 (forward). |
Posted in: Cluster AY Annotation Tips → Repressor-like proteins
Link to this post | posted 15 Aug, 2018 23:46 | |
---|---|
|
I just looked at the genome of KandZ (Cluster D1). There is a VIP2 gene in that area in other phage genomes (Troll4_gp7). For reasons I have not yet investigated, gene 6 and 7 (in most of these genomes) are in the same pham (4561). But only the second gene hits VIP2 in HHPred. In addition, that second gene can be in a different pham (5921)that is not a VIP2. This true in KandZ. (posted 8-15-1![]() |
Link to this post | posted 06 Aug, 2018 16:27 | |
---|---|
|
Sally, Hi. Using web Phamerator's gene numbers, I would call gene 16 a TAC. Neither 15 or 18 are good candidates by HHpred (gp 15 is a ribosomal protein hit) and 18 has no significant matches). I believe that gp 16 is also a TAC, BUT I would not call it. I can't find a slippery sequence and the Pfam hit is too weak for me. |
Posted in: Cluster Q Annotation Tips → tail assembly chaperones
Link to this post | posted 25 Jul, 2018 16:37 | |
---|---|
|
I am not sure exactly how to answer this without seeing data. Know that we made a decision about 1 1/2 years ago, to call every small gene between the major capsid and the major tail a -head-to-tail connector protein. Those calls should be ignored without HHPred info. If your BLAST hits our phages, you should be able to tell the difference because when we were calling 'everything', the label was "head-to-tail connector". Once we made the change we are labeling true hits to head-to-tail proteins "head-to-tail connector complex proteins". I hope that helps. it is a bit confusing. debbie |
Posted in: Functional Annotation → Head-tail connectors
Link to this post | posted 24 Jul, 2018 03:49 | |
---|---|
|
The last feature of this genome is not in phamerator or in the gene list on phagesDB: CDS join(16287..16604,1..96) /gene="25" /locus_tag="PBI_EMPEROR_25" /codon_start=1 /transl_table=11 /product="HNH endonuclease" /translation="MTALPAWAGDYSRRLTALCLATYGDTCHLCGRPGATTADHLIPR SVSYDDSLANLRPAHQRCNSARGAMPIETWRARFTASTAPRSSRWSRPSSSLTPQVSA ALRPAAFFSPNAQNKGSVHTEKPSETTKGPDNATT" |
Posted in: Cluster DM Annotation Tips → a wrap around gene at the end
Link to this post | posted 22 Jul, 2018 02:35 | |
---|---|
|
Maria, I would call both of these. They meet the cut-off criteria that we have set forth. for Neferthena, it looks like the end are called correctly. For Andromedas, you will need to trim the last 2 bases (GA). debbie |