Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.
Recent Activity
All posts created by cdshaffer
Link to this post | posted 27 Feb, 2021 19:03 | |
---|---|
|
in the database there are 11 phage genes with subcluster B1 they all appear in current pham 48591: for the totally geeky here is the mysql query I used:
|
Posted in: Cluster B Annotation Tips → Holin
Link to this post | posted 19 Feb, 2021 18:12 | |
---|---|
|
The current versions of both chrome and firefox have stopped support for FTP. I started up an old version of the SEA-VM and used the really old version of firefox therein to confirm that the FTP server is up and running. So to access it directly you will need to use an FTP client to connect. In the past, on Windows machines, I have used Filezilla and cyberduck to access FTP sites. If you have a mac, you can also just connect using the finder -> go menu -> connect to server -> enter address of ftp://cobamide2.bio.pitt.edu/ -> click connect -> select connect as guest => click connect. This will open a finder window which is connected to the ftp server. Be patient with file loading it can be slow; the file you want (dna master.exe) is in the DNAMas folder. You can use typical drag and drop to copy the file. Final step, of course, is to transfer the file to your windows machine by whatever method you find most convenient. |
Posted in: DNA Master → DNA master server down?
Link to this post | posted 17 Feb, 2021 16:53 | |
---|---|
|
The issues you are having are related to the restructuring of the database that was undertaken last fall. You will need to upgrade to a compatible version of PhamNexus. I can see that Christian in the Hatfull lab is still keeping it up to date as he posted code changes last October to make it compatible with the new database format. He will need to tell you how to update to that working version. |
Posted in: Bioinformatic Tools and Analyses → PhamNexus on SEA-VM
Link to this post | posted 09 Feb, 2021 19:33 | |
---|---|
|
This was due to a database versioning issue (i.e. starterator was still on version 391 and phagesdb had upated to version 392). The report is now available here. If you want all the details on the how and why this happens, and how to check versions see this thread: this thread If you want to see which version Phamerator.org, pecaan and starterator are on use these instructions: phagesdb see: http://databases.hatfull.org/Actino_Draft/Actino_Draft.version starterator see: http://phages.wustl.edu/starterator/database.version pecaan: look on any "pham maps" page just above the map phamerator.org: open the pull down menu in the top left |
Posted in: Starterator → Pham not found in Starterator
Link to this post | posted 23 Jan, 2021 19:33 | |
---|---|
|
When it comes to enzyme naming issues I prefer the KEGG and exapasy "Enzyme" databases. For example here is the info on this enzyme at Expasy: https://enzyme.expasy.org/EC/2.7.6.1 The preferred name is Ribose-phosphate diphosphokinase, so they agree with your preference for "kinase". I also note that one of the mentioned synonyms also uses kinase. I have always been pretty agnostic on which term we should put on our approved function list but once it is there I think it makes all our work better if we all try to use that particular term as it creates a more consistent data set across all the SEA phages. phosphoribosyl transferase appears to be a general term as it hits to about 25 different enzymes in the Expasy database, the vast marjority of which are glycosyltransferases. |
Link to this post | posted 15 Dec, 2020 21:05 | |
---|---|
|
ok release of starterator reports for database version 387 are now available and are tagged as the current version. Links from pecaan and phagesdb should now be working (at least until the next database update). Please report if any links fail at this point. |
Link to this post | posted 15 Dec, 2020 18:00 | |
---|---|
|
OK this appears to be an out of sync error. The current version of the database is 387. The starterator analysis to create the 14 thousand or so reports is on going so the web pages still report the old version 386. The computations should complete and be posted by the end of the day at which point the links from pecaan and phagesdb should work. In the mean time you can use these links to get to the reports for those three genes in the older 386 database reports here: Peel 30: old pham number 44662 and link http://phages.wustl.edu/386/Pham44662Report.pdf Peel 32:old pham number 44868 and link http://phages.wustl.edu/386/Pham44868Report.pdf Peel 33:old pham number 44899 and link http://phages.wustl.edu/386/Pham44899Report.pdf There is a way to check if the "out of sync" error is likely to be the cause of these types of missing phams by comparing the reported database versions. This link will always show the current version number on the Starterator server. Alternatively, you can look on any starterator report where you will see something like this: "This analysis was run 12/09/20 on database version 386" near the top of the first page of text. In pecaan you can go to the Pham Maps page and look just above the map where you will see something like this: Phamerator Version: 387 . Unfortunately there is no easy way to get the version number of the database at phagesdb but you can always check this link to see which version is on the database server, all the programs download from there. |
Link to this post | posted 15 Dec, 2020 16:52 | |
---|---|
|
These are typically due to database at phagesdb being out of sync with the current database for the starterator reports but this should not be happening "for weeks". Are you using pecaan or phagesdb for your links? Could you post the pham numbers you are looking for? |
Link to this post | posted 10 Dec, 2020 18:58 | |
---|---|
|
Ok, those look pretty good. I now suspect our issue might have been with the age/storage of the grids. Thanks |
Posted in: Phage Discovery/Isolation → Electron Microscopes
Link to this post | posted 10 Dec, 2020 16:45 | |
---|---|
|
Our dept purchased an SEM with a TEM detector a couple of years ago. We tried several times but were never able to get sufficient resolution to see phage on the grid. To be fair, we were just testing older grids that had been returned after imaging at the EM core so fresh grids might have given us viable images; but it really looked like we were never going to get the resolution we needed to see things as small as phage. If you can get it to work please post your protocols we would be very interested, it would open up some interesting curriculum opportunities. Sorry I don't know any of the specifics on our system but I could ask our microscope facility if you want the specifics. |
Posted in: Phage Discovery/Isolation → Electron Microscopes