SEA-PHAGES Logo

The official website of the HHMI Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science program.

Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.

All posts created by cdshaffer

| posted 15 Jul, 2019 20:07
for phage Saftant gene 68 (45610-45200) we have found good evidence for an anti-restriction protein but the matches are not to ArdA-like like proteins but rather a second type of antirestriction proteins called OCR. The OCR-type anti-restiction protein is found in phage T7 and is one of the first protein products expressed following infection (see this NAR paper). OCR type are typically shorter (~120 AA) than ArdA (170-180) and have sufficiently different crystal structures that I think we should avoid using the ArdA-like approved term for this protein. Here is the image of the two structures side by side.

For details, see phage saftant in PECAAN but briefly saftant 68 hits by hhpred with 94.4% probability to the crystal of gene 0.3 protein from phage T7 (D chain of this crystal) with ~90% coverage of both subject and query. I would propose either adding this second type as an approved function "antirestriction protein, OCR-like" or simply adding another term without the ArdA-like (i.e. "antirestriction protein" ) to avoid over annotation.
Edited 15 Jul, 2019 20:10
Posted in: Request a new function on the SEA-PHAGES official listnew antirestriction protein type
| posted 28 Jun, 2019 19:11
Christian and I are working on a version of the VM with the experimental version of starterator in the faculty account as well as k-phamerate for validation and phamnexus for splitstree prep. Unfortunately, there is no easy way to get the newer version of aragorn that trims the genes properly installed on that old Ubuntu 14.04 VM.
Posted in: tRNAsAragorn Issue
| posted 25 Jun, 2019 18:23
OK since we are working on a few phage here, I have installed command line Aragorn ver 1.2.38. If anyone is in a hurry and does not want to wait until web based Aragorn is back up, I can easily run aragorn command line for you, just send me an email with the sequence as a fasta file attachment and I can email back the aragorn results.
Posted in: tRNAsAragorn Issue
| posted 25 Jun, 2019 16:33
A quick google search suggests that the "ERR_CONTENT_LENGTH_MISMATCH" error is probably an issue with nginx (the web server software) so yes it is time for an email.

I did look for anywhere else that was running public available Aragorn but only found a galaxy server running the older 1.2.36 which does not appear to trim correctly (based on a single prediction in phage saftant that we ran to test).

If anyone is desperate, one can easily install the command line version with conda on mac, or apt-get on ubuntu version 18 or 19. Still looking for a viable web based solution.
Edited 25 Jun, 2019 17:44
Posted in: tRNAsAragorn Issue
| posted 05 Jun, 2019 18:04
In situations like this we are left with the very hand wavy answer that it is simply that the functions provided by the holins are being provided by proteins which cannot be detected with bioinformatic based tests. This can happen by either (1) convergent evolution (i.e. in this context, two completely different proteins evolving to carry out the function) or that (2) a completely different biochemical pathway has evolved in the B1 phages to "solve" the problem of how to lyse the host cell wall

In either situation bioinformatics fails us (by definition really) and we are left going back to the wet bench to answer the question "how do B1 phage lyse their host?"

So maybe someone else might be aware of published or unpublished results from bench work in this area and might have further insights.
Posted in: Phage BiologyHolin Gene
| posted 28 May, 2019 20:12
I have just returned from vacation and have updated the the starterator pages to the most recent version of the phamerator database which was posted this morning. I checked bunnies gene 32, it is now in pham 39047 and appears to be in sync across pecaan, starterator, phagesdb.org and phamerator.org. Checking phage Fulbright shows some discrepancies across the various platforms but that could be syncronization issues since the last update was posted so recently. I would give it a day and if reports are still missing please repost and I can look into it.
Posted in: StarteratorPham not found in Starterator
| posted 10 May, 2019 21:57
Just a heads up that I will be out of the country for the next two weeks and will have unknown quality of internet connections throughout my travels. As such, it is likely I will not be able to update online starterator reports in a quick and timely fashion. Most pham groups remain static and the old report should suffice in most cases. However, should an updated version of the pham database move your gene of interest to a new pham number the virtual machine remains a solution if you are in a hurry. See this page for help. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Edited 10 May, 2019 21:59
Posted in: StarteratorIntermittent Starterator updates
| posted 10 May, 2019 21:44
there is a button that should do that but if the button on each gene is not working the whole phage might not either. Go to Admin menu -> phages; search for your phage and click the edit button. From there you should get a page which includes button to reblast the whole phage.
Posted in: PECAANRerun function not updating
| posted 06 May, 2019 20:10
We have found a few enzymes in some of our streptomyces phages where the "like" part of the approved function list did not apply. For these we posted a request for a "new" function without the "like" part. In support we provided references to the papers describing the novel structure of the protein as evidence that our hiqh quality HHPRED hits to these crystals mean the more generic term should be added to the list.

However in this case for Jacko 31 I think the "NrdH-like glutaredoxin" is appropriate since on PECAAN results there is an HHPRED hit with >98% prob and >98% coverage to 4FIW_A which is the published crystal structure of NrdH from E coli. Given this hiqh quality hit by HHPRED to NrdH I would say that the term "NrdH-like" does apply.
Posted in: Functional AnnotationCluster EB/ED glutaredoxin
| posted 18 Apr, 2019 15:05
I just tried online phamerator.org and was successful so it might have been a temporary issue. If it is still failing for the students I would suggest trying to create a new account as a work around, also posting to the chat on the phamerator page can't hurt.
Posted in: PhameratorLocked out of Phamerator