Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.
Recent Activity
Dan Russell posted in Congrats to Steve Caruso and Beth Wilkes — 2025 ASM Outstanding Instructor Award, Honorable Mention
ACMPhageHunters posted in Clarification Question About HNH Endonuclease Function Determination in view of hits to the Ref Sequences
cdshaffer posted in Clarification Question About HNH Endonuclease Function Determination in view of hits to the Ref Sequences
All posts created by scaruso
| Link to this post | posted 11 Dec, 2019 01:44 | |
|---|---|
|
|
Been using it, and it's great! Steve |
| Link to this post | posted 01 Dec, 2019 20:21 | |
|---|---|
|
|
If I can make sure I am perfectly clear? This is generalizable, correct? If we see GTGATG or ATGATG, go with the second as a rule, and not just in clusters O, J, and M. I presume it is also true with TTGATG? Steve |
| Link to this post | posted 01 Oct, 2019 15:34 | |
|---|---|
|
|
Hello, I hesitate to ask this question because I don't want to imply impatience. But I want to know what to tell students who are asking me questions. So, here goes. How often are phages entries checked in to PhagesDB? I am hoping to give students some sort of estimate, if possible, and prevent some of the double entries I know you get. Thanks! Steve |
| Link to this post | posted 18 Aug, 2019 20:03 | |
|---|---|
|
|
I see you added Topcons now, too. Cool! Steve |
| Link to this post | posted 12 Aug, 2019 18:34 | |
|---|---|
|
|
Welkin, The thing that worries us about both this and Nehal 03 was that it looked a lot like we were seeing just the DNA binding part of a gene, like with the many anti-toxin hits we get that are really just HTH-domains. But it was similar enough to the previous call to merit a look. Thanks! Steve |
| Link to this post | posted 12 Aug, 2019 00:47 | |
|---|---|
|
|
Hello all, I think I might have the 'terminase, small subunit' in the BE2 IchabodCrane, which hasn't yet been identified. It looks very similar to gp3 from NEHalo in terms of coverage and the coiled-coils hits using PCOILS described in the forum post: https://seaphages.org/forums/topic/4736/. IchabodCrane_gp121 MKECPICGKDKELDEFGRQITNPSKFYKWCRDCRLSMARRKKNNFDEGRALRSKTVQLRRLTDAQVTEVRLLAEWNTPYTEIAQQYGVSATTISKVVNRGYANVY HHPred https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/#/jobs/Ichabod_g121 PCOILS https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/#/jobs/ICH121 For reference, NEHalo gp3 in HHPred and PCOILS: HHPred https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/#/jobs/NEHALO3b PCOILS https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/#/jobs/NEHALO3 Let me know what you think. Thanks! Steve |
| Link to this post | posted 09 Aug, 2019 21:47 | |
|---|---|
|
|
Hello all, I think I have the 'terminase, small subunit' in IchabodCrane, a BE2, in which it hasn't yet been identified. It looks very similar to gp3 from NEHalo in terms of coverage and the coiled-coils hits using PCOILS. Could you take a look and see if you agree? I think it is a reasonable call. IchabodCrane_gp121 MKECPICGKDKELDEFGRQITNPSKFYKWCRDCRLSMARRKKNNFDEGRALRSKTVQLRRLTDAQVTEVRLLAEWNTPYTEIAQQYGVSATTISKVVNRGYANVY HHPred https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/#/jobs/Ichabod_g121 PCOILS https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/#/jobs/ICH121 For reference, NEHalo gp3 in HHPred and PCOILS: HHPred https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/#/jobs/NEHALO3b PCOILS https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/#/jobs/NEHALO3 Thanks! Steve I created a fresh post of this labeled BE - terminase, small subunit, here: https://seaphages.org/forums/topic/4942/?page=1#post-7410 |
| Link to this post | posted 03 Aug, 2019 21:15 | |
|---|---|
|
|
Welkin, Should we use D family protein or protein D family? I think that's all we need, then can submit. Thanks! Steve |
| Link to this post | posted 16 Jul, 2019 12:51 | |
|---|---|
|
|
We found a homolog in a Bacillus phage we just annotated, I believe, and called it: DNA mimic domain containing protein, since the coding sequence was larger than the domain you describe above, but contained it. But if it is the right size, perhaps DNA mimic protein might be a good choice? Steve |
| Link to this post | posted 15 Jul, 2019 17:07 | |
|---|---|
|
|
Excellent, thanks! Steve |
