Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.
Recent Activity
Ruth Plymale posted in Tenure track Microbiology faculty position at Ouachita Baptist University in Arkansas
bburnes posted in Calling start in FC phage Phrampa
cdshaffer posted in Calling start in FC phage Phrampa
bburnes posted in Calling start in FC phage Phrampa
Debbie Jacobs-Sera posted in Calling start in FC phage Phrampa
Tail Terminator in Cluster EE
Link to this post | posted 01 May, 2020 13:58 | |
---|---|
|
Hi everyone, I am finishing up a new Cluster EE phage (PoRanda), and I had a question about a functional call. I am looking at gene 7 in PoRanda, and its aa sequence is below. In comparing this gene to other EE's in phamerator, as well as blast searches etc., the majority of the data says I should call this as a tail terminator. However, in the functional assignments sheet it says that to be called a tail terminator it "must have an HHPRED alignment to one of the following: SPP1 17 (5A21 chain G in the macromolecular complex) or Lambda U (3FZ2_chains A through F)". In the HHPred hits for this gene, I do see 3FZ2, with a probability just under 90%. However, the E-values for this hit (and all HHPred hits) are not good. The E-value for the 3FZ2 hit is 8.4. 5A21 is also present, with a coverage of 86.6% and an E-value of 13. Looking at the pham (Pham # 19507), the majority of genomes have this annotated as a tail terminator, while others call it a minor tail protein. I'm looking for guidance on how to call this, given then HHPred results described above. Thank you! MSTLGDLRRELADDVAGSPVELTTYDHVPARVQLPAAFVMAGAPYVEADQTFGSSIVRFGVVLLTQPSMNADETDQLDERIESVQRRLLSAGWLVERIERPEIQDLNGAEVLATALSVAAGGVTFP |
Link to this post | posted 01 May, 2020 20:00 | |
---|---|
|
Hi Jamie, I would continue to call this a tail terminator for 2 reasons. One, the minor tail protein of lambda that it hits is a tail terminator along with the SPP1 hits. Secondly, it is in the right place for it. I agree, we fall under the threshold of 90% probability, and I usually don't consider anything under 90%, but in this case I think it is a good prediction. |
Link to this post | posted 01 May, 2020 20:52 | |
---|---|
|
Thank you, Debbie! I'll call it a tail terminator. |