Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.
Recent Activity
Phosphoesterase or metallophosphoesterase? A clarification question
Link to this post | posted 10 Jun, 2023 05:47 | |
---|---|
|
I am inclined to call a phosphoesterase function for subcluster M1 phages Glaske16_gp129 (66640-67299) & Dulcita gp 126 (66622-66181 bp), but will seek clarification given that the top 15 hits in phagesDB are to metallophosphoesterases. The sequence is 100% identical between the above phages: MSNVFFTSDLHIGHKKVVASRTTVDGEPAFPDLDNLPEWFGDFEIESYNRILADKWDTTVGKDDVVWVLGDISSGTKSGQEMALEWLSRRPGRKRLIKGNHDGVHPMYRDKAKWVKAYGEVFEDMDTAARIRVALSGGGHVDALLSHFPYMGDHTSVDRHTQWRLPNNGTILLHGHTHSSRRMSSCGGSLQVHVGVDAWNGYPVSMDEIRSYVEIWEDVZ According to the Official SEA-PHAGES Function List, a metallophosphoesterase, "Must contain a HEXXH motif to coordinate the metal ion." I can see the HEXXH motif in Luchodor_gp60, the sample gene for metallophosphoesterase in the Functions list. Whereas there are HHPred hits to metallophosphoesterase, my reasons for being weary about calling it a metallophosphoesterase rather than a phosphoesterase are two-fold: 1. I do not seem to see the HEXXH motif (except if the rule is flexible) 2. The top two HHPred hits are to phages D29 gp 66 & L5 gp 66, both of which are phosphoesterase. D29 is a well-studied, prototypic phage. According to Rudner, Fawcett & Losick (1999; https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.96.26.14765), the conserved sequence HEXXH is a hallmark of metalloproteases. An HEXXH motif should have an "H" followed by an "E", then by any two amino acids followed by an "H" (see attached). I did a search for "HE" in each of the sequences. >phageD29_gp66 (phosphoesterase) HEXXH motif not seen MSNVWFTSDLHIGHAKVAEDRDWAGPDHDLHLAELWDEQVGKEDVVWILGDISSGGTRAQLDALGWLLNRPGRKRLILGNHDRPHPMYRDAPRLSRLYWNVLDYMSTAARLRVPLDGGGHTNVLLSHFPYVGDHTAEQRFTQWRLRDEGLILLHGHTHSRIIRSTMTNPRQIHVGLDAWHDLVPMDEVREMVNDIEEGL >Glaske16_gp129 (66640-67299) & Dulcita gp 126 (66622-66181 bp); HEXXH motif not seen MSNVFFTSDLHIGHKKVVASRTTVDGEPAFPDLDNLPEWFGDFEIESYNRILADKWDTTVGKDDVVWVLGDISSGTKSGQEMALEWLSRRPGRKRLIKGNHDGVHPMYRDKAKWVKAYGEVFEDMDTAARIRVALSGGGHVDALLSHFPYMGDHTSVDRHTQWRLPNNGTILLHGHTHSSRRMSSCGGSLQVHVGVDAWNGYPVSMDEIRSYVEIWEDVZ Luchodor_gp60 (metallophosphoesterase ref sequence) has the HEXXH motif (underlined) MSKRIVVVSDTQIPFDDRKALKAVVGFIGDTQPDEVVHIGDLMDYPSPSRWTKGTAEEFAQRIKPDSEQAKRRFLEPLRARYDGPVKVHEGNHDSRPFEYLHKFAPALVEYADQFRFQNLLDFDGFGVEVAPEFYKLAPGWVSTHGHRGGVRLTQKAGDTAYNAMMRFNTSVIIGHTHRQGLKPHTLGYGGHQKVLWSMEVGNLMNMHLAQYLKGATANWQTGFGLLTVDGHHVKPELVPVVGGSFSVDGHVWKV Based on the above, I would call the above Glaske16 & Dulcita genes phosphoesterases. Or could I be missing something? Thanks! Fred |
Link to this post | posted 15 Jun, 2023 00:33 | |
---|---|
|
I would call this a phosphoesterase too. debbie |