Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.
Recent Activity
Viknesh Sivanathan posted in did you know you can do restriction digests in the microwave?
nic.vega posted in did you know you can do restriction digests in the microwave?
nic.vega posted in did you know you can do restriction digests in the microwave?
Viknesh Sivanathan posted in did you know you can do restriction digests in the microwave?
nic.vega posted in did you know you can do restriction digests in the microwave?
All posts created by viknesh
Link to this post | posted 10 Dec, 2024 19:21 | |
---|---|
|
nic.vegaThanks for sharing this – very nice gel. If your student is willing to do it one more time with a third setup: Regular 1 hr; Regular 1 min, MWV 1 min, that'd be helpful. Even in our regular setup (no microwave),I think it is likely that the majority of DNA is restricted within the first minute, which might potentially give us the same results as the MWV reaction. Thanks, Nic. Vic |
Link to this post | posted 05 Dec, 2024 22:02 | |
---|---|
|
Hi Nic, It might be useful to gather more side-by-side data for digests done using our standard method vs the microwave method. It might be quicker to use the microwave, but it’s unclear to me if the quality of the data is where we need it to be (I appreciate that the gel might just be a litle smeary). At the moment, we are beginning to look for phage DNA modifications, which can be gleaned by looking for inconsistencies in the expected digest pattern (i.e. a virtual digest based on the DNA sequence) vs pattern observed when the actual digest is run on a gel. If it is tricky to get good digests and gels using the microwave method, then that’ll impact the utility of the data for that purpose. The TrixiePhatell gel from a regular digest can be viewed here. We’re always excited to hear of new ways of doing our collective research. As we learn of new strategies though, the SEA team usually invests time to understand the implications of the new technique for our collective work before we incorporate anything into our regular workflow. This is so we can continue to leverage the large datasets that are generated by faculty and students from across the program to glean new insights. If some of that data is generated differently, it can impact our interpretation. So if you are willing to gather some data to be reviewed, perhaps over the next semester, please do share. Best, Vic |
Link to this post | posted 19 Nov, 2024 18:34 | |
---|---|
|
Click here to download a template for contributing readily-intepretable data that is publishable on QUBES for efforts to raise lysogens for a given phage, regardless if you were successful or unsuccessful at raising lysogens. The datacard template shows the series of experiments that must be conducted (Protocols 11.1, 11.3, and 11.4) and resulting experimental data that must be included in order for your data to reviewed and considered for publication on QUBES. If you have any questions about raising lysogens and publishing your data, please do not hesitate to ask using the form below or emailing the SEA Team. |
Link to this post | posted 25 Oct, 2024 02:37 | |
---|---|
|
rocky2I'e never seen that before, Rocky. I'd be surprised if that was microbial growth since that solution is a very strong denaturant. In any case, it might be worth returning it. |
Link to this post | posted 17 Oct, 2024 13:56 | |
---|---|
|
DrCatalase Hi Sean, Are you seeing this for one phage or for multiple phages from your class? It's not uncommon for a 6-bp cutter like NspI and SacII to not cut phage DNA at all. In fact, this was true for several phages isolated by faculty using A. globiformis at the summer training this year. For that reason, we encourage using a 4-bp cutter. Typically, we recommend using HaeIII, which almost always cuts DNA, which reassures you that your reactions were setup correctly. Thought much less common, if phage DNA is modified, say at the C, then even HaeIII might not cut DNA. To help us decipher such interesting results, more recently, we've encouraged faculty to also include a second 4-bp cutter, MseI; HaeIII and MseI are GC and AT cutters respectively. I dont think longer incubation times are necessary. Instead, I'd recommend two things. First, include HaeIII (and MseI too, if you can). Second, maybe test your NspI and SacII on any DNA that you know they will cut (eg. NspI will cut pUC19 plasmid DNA). |
Link to this post | posted 30 Sep, 2024 17:11 | |
---|---|
|
nietof Wanted to share that no faculty has shared with me that they've tried this. |
Link to this post | posted 20 Sep, 2024 14:48 | |
---|---|
|
bavina The precipitation could be problematic for at least two reasons: First, it is hard to tell if the media is contaminated and second, the precipitate itself, say calcium chloride, might have been a necessary component of the solution needed for infectivity. If you keep those two things in mind, you can still use your media. To address the possibility of contamonation, you'll want to include controls. For example, when using the top agar for a plaque assay, include a control where no host is added to the top agar. No lawn should form and the top agar should remain clear after 24 hours. To address the concern that precipitation might negatively impact infection, you'll want to pay attention to any change in infectivity for phages that you've isolated. In the longer term, it would be good to change the media components. As we look to no longer use Fiher brand peptone, the HHMI SEA team hasn't had a chance to test alternatives to Bacto products that we know are quite expensive, but we plan to do so – more soon! |
Link to this post | posted 06 Sep, 2024 23:42 | |
---|---|
|
serivas It is likley that you'll be able to culture the bacteria we use for phage-hunting just as well using peptone or tryptone. However, for us to compare data from across the SEA program, I would recommend using peptone. If you use tryptone, it will be important for you to disclose this information (i.e. that you are not usingP PYCa) when contributing data to the program and when publishing elsewhere. |
Link to this post | posted 03 Sep, 2024 13:51 | |
---|---|
|
engstrom No apologies necessary, Eric. This is why this forum can be so valuable – thanks for so quickly responding to this post. We'll try to find additional ways to disseminate this info. Vic |
Link to this post | posted 03 Sep, 2024 11:46 | |
---|---|
|
Hi all, Eric Engstrom recently shared the following: "Our problems finally went away when we switched from Fisher Brand Agar to Bacto Agar. With Bacto Agar, we did not need to drop the CaCl2 level and we could return to using our regular DI water. The stuff is expensive, so we have a container of Bacto Agar labeled "Top-agar Only" and we still use the Fisher Agar with no issue for our plate media. |