Welcome to the forums at seaphages.org. Please feel free to ask any questions related to the SEA-PHAGES program. Any logged-in user may post new topics and reply to existing topics. If you'd like to see a new forum created, please contact us using our form or email us at info@seaphages.org.
Recent Activity
Debbie Jacobs-Sera posted in Potential feature deletion in Ibouu (cluster F)
allie.c.smith@ttu.edu posted in Potential feature deletion in Ibouu (cluster F)
brueschhoff posted in Surplus Phages - When is a good time to save those?
Debbie Jacobs-Sera posted in Surplus Phages - When is a good time to save those?
brueschhoff posted in Surplus Phages - When is a good time to save those?
All posts created by allie.c.smith@ttu.edu
| Link to this post | posted today, 16:46 | |
|---|---|
|
We are currently annotating Ibouu, which is in cluster F I have a specific question about Feature 42 which is a reverse at bp position 31492bp-31434bp This feature overlaps it's upstream feature 41 (which is a forward) by nearly half its bp. length at position 31218bp-31379bp, and feature 42 is not identified by GeneMark with little coding potential. Features 41 (31218bp-31379bp) and 43 (31738bp-31544bp) which is also a Reverse have high coding potential per GenMark and we feel are real genes which we plan to leave included in the annotation. I was hoping to get guidance on deleting Feature 42 - even though it would leave a gap between features 41 and 43, we feel that because it overlaps so much with the previous gene and it has weak coding potential and wasn't auto-annotated by GeneMark at all, it should be deleted from our annotation. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, |