SEA-PHAGES Logo

The official website of the HHMI Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science program.

Abstract Summary

Below is a summary of the abstract you submitted. Presenting author(s) is shown in bold.

If any changes need to be made, you can modify the abstract or change the authors.

You can also download a .docx version of this abstract.

If there are any problems, please email Dan at dar78@pitt.edu and he'll take care of them!

This abstract was last modified on May 24, 2024 at 10:13 p.m..

Hope College
Corresponding Faculty Member: Joseph Stukey, stukey@hope.edu
This abstract WILL be considered for a talk.
A tale of two immunity repressors: studies from K1 and F2 mycobacteriophages
Davi Zola de Araujo, Dulcinea Licavoli, Jairus Meer, Joseph Stukey

Phage immunity repressors are DNA-binding proteins that repress gene transcription. They play a critical role in maintaining phage lysogeny, and as a prophage, provide the lysogen an effective defense mechanism against repeat phage infections. Twitch and Peel are two nearly identical K1 mycobacteriophages isolated at Hope College in 2013 and 2014, respectively. Their genomes are 59,711 bp in length and differ at just three base positions, one of which is in their immunity repressor genes that alters an amino acid in an alpha helix predicted to interface with DNA. We hypothesized that this difference could impact the actions of the immunity repressors. To test this hypothesis we are comparatively examining lysogeny frequency and switch rates in both phages. Lysogeny frequency was different and always higher in Peel. Further, Twitch lysogen colonies tended to be smaller in size, perhaps reflecting decreased lysogen stability. A lysogen switch rate analysis is underway; we predict a higher switch rate for Twitch. Our second immunity repressor story involves Soul22, a temperate F2 phage with two immunity repressor genes. Although both are most similar to gene products of Cluster F mycobacteriophages, one (Soul22_49) is exclusively associated with Cluster F mycobacteriophages, while the second (Soul22_44) also shows strong similarity to immunity repressors found in mycobacteriophages of clusters A, C, J, K, and Rhodococcus phages of cluster CA. Further, Soul22_44 may actually be a functional cross cluster immunity repressor as an F2 Soul22 lysogen shows strong resistance to infection by several A1 mycobacteriophages. Work to delete Soul22_44 and test its predicted and essential role in providing that resistance to A1 mycobacteriophages is underway.